|
We do not know the precise origin of the word daimon in ancient Greece. Thought to be the cause of all ailments in Homer's time (9th century
BCE), the daimones were also believed to heal and confer health, happiness, and harmony. The pre-Socratic Greek philosopher Empedocles
(fifth century BCE) describes psyche or soul in this context, and identifies daimon with self. Heraclitus writes that "man's character
is his daimon". According to psychologist Stephen A. Diamond, " [t]he daimon was that divine, mediating spiritual power that impelled one's actions and
determined one's destiny. It was, " he continues, " inborn and immortal, embodying all innate talents, tendencies (both positive and negative), and natural
abilities ".1
Plato (427-347 BCE) asserts that " [a]s regards the supreme form of soul in us, we must conceive that the god has conferred it upon
each ... as a guiding [daimon] that which [...] lifts us from earth toward our celestial affinity, like a plant whose roots are not in the earth,
but in the heavens ".2 The concept of daimon as one's personal companion and guide emerged along these lines in the fifth century. Perhaps
the best known case in point is Socrates, who credited his daimon as the source of his philosophical inspiration.
The Romans absorbed and put their own spin on a great many ideas from ancient Greece. Rollo May tells us that the daimonic was translated into Latin as genii.
Genii
[...] is a concept in Roman religion from which our word "genius" comes and which originally meant a tutelary deity, an incorporeal spirit presiding over
the destiny of a person, and later became a peculiar mental talent. As " genius " (its root being the Latin genere) means to generate, to beget,
so the daimonic is the voice of the generative process in the individual. The daimonic is [that] unique pattern of sensibilities and powers which
constitutes the individual as a self in relation to [the] world.3
That last line is especially interesting. Think of " the individual as a self ", characterized by a " unique pattern of sensibilities and powers ".
We might interpret this pattern as an ordered process. For example, Jungian analyst Jean Shinoda Bolen describes archetypal patterns that
constellate in an individual, resulting in a personality which, given the presence of a healthy ego, operates like a committee with ego as chair.4 In her
model, the story and character of a particular archetype may be recognized by the ego as self-descriptive. That archetype may evince the quality of
the daimon or genius.
The daimon can be thought of in other ways. For instance, Otto Rank writes of " will " as " a positive guiding organization and integration of self " that
permits the individual to inhibit and control instinctual drives.5 Jung recognizes that self could contain many subselves and
describes the presence of a " transcendent function " that could bring together elements at variance with one another.6
Whether or not we regard Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID, formerly called Multiple Personality Disorder, MPD) as a viable clinical entity7, many therapists have recognized the presence of an " inner-self-helper " among the " alters " that present in this condition. In an important paper written by Ralph B. Alison in 1974, the " Inner Self " is
regarded as " the manifestation of a higher part of the personality " it knows all the other " personalities " in the system, the history of each, and the appropriate therapeutic
course.8 Along similar lines, Haraldur Erlendsson refers to the " Inner Mind "; he reviews the importance of numinosum (L. numen, the power and presence of a
transcendent reality, a mysterium tremendum et fascinans9), describes an approach to being with the Inner Mind and finding a "Place of Healing"
which the Inner Mind can create.10 Sarah Y. Krakauer writes of the " inner wisdom of the unconscious mind " and the triumph of " inner authority " in her
Collective Heart model for treating DID.11 We might apply the concept of daimon or genius in each of these cases.
Note that, as Hesiod (8th century BCE) writes, the daimones " mantle themselves in [...] mist ".12
As the ordinating principle of self, the daimon or genius cannot be defined or delineated. It inheres in psychodynamics, manifests in action, and also presents in dreams.
It can be experienced in the act of doing. " Doing ", says Bolen, " is becoming ".13
Some believe that it is important to understand the nature of one's own daimon/genius. " If you have a genius for building houses or putting automobile engines together, " writes Pastoral counselor and Jungian
analyst John A. Sanford, " you pursue a very different course in life than if you have a genius for art or psychotherapy. "14
Sanford asserts that the cooperation of the ego is required if the daimon/genius is to operate successfully. From the perspective of ego psychology, that makes sense. Yet this divine aspect of
personality may be perceived to operate through the ego, whether the ego is aware of it or not. When we speak of one's " calling ", in that context, we do not simply refer to one's profession but
rather, to the fundamental character, orientation and activity of the ego, in which the daimon/genius is immanent. The concept is useful because it helps us appreciate the complexities of self-expression in
terms of the personal and the transcendent.
- Stephen A. Diamond
Anger, Madness, and the Daimonic: The psychological genesis of violence, evil, and creativity.
Albany: SUNY, 1996:66-9.
Diamond's text is a veritable gold mine of insights and references.
- Plato
Timaeus (90-90d)
John Warrington, ed. and trans. NY: Dutton, 1965:131-2.
- Rollo May
Love and Will NY: W.W. Norton, 1969:125.
- Jean Shinoda Bolen
Goddesses in Everywoman: A new psychology of women.
NY: Harper & Row, 1984:266-67.
- Robert J. Lifton
The Protean Self: Human resilience in an age of fragmentation.
NY: Basic Books, 1993:25.
Lifton cites Otto Rank, quoted from E. James Lieberman
Acts of Will: The life and work of otto rank.
(NY: Free Press, 1985:357-58)
- Robert J. Lifton op. cit.
Lifton cites Carl Jung, "The Transcendent Function",in
The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, Collected Works, vol.8
R.F.C. Hull, Trans.
Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969:90.
- Ian Hacking
Rewriting the Soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory.
Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995:18.
Ian Hacking reports that emphasis on the existence of more than one 'personality' in any individual is regarded as
"wrongheaded" by several influential psychiatrists in the multiple movement. He tells us that:
In 1993 David Spiegel, chair of the dissociative disorders committee for the 1994 DSM-IV, wrote that "there is a widespread
misunderstanding of the essential psychopathology of this dissociative disorder, which is failure of integration of various
aspects of identity, memory, and consciousness. The problem is not having more than one personality; it is having less than one
personality."
Compare the above with the following comments by James Hillman:
We conceive our psychological nature to be naturally divided into portions and phases, a composition of earlier and later historical
levels, various zones and developmental strata, many complexes and archetypal persons. We are no longer single beings in the image
of a single God, but are always constituted of multiple parts... Because we have come to realize that each of us is normally a flux of
figures, we no longer need to be menaced by the notion of multiple personality...
James Hillman. Re-Visioning Psychology. NY: Harper & Row, 1975:24.
And compare Hillman's remarks with those of Jeremy Rifkin on multiple personas:
The new relational personality is as fluid and transitory as the networks people engage in. MIT professor Sherry Turkle, who has
conducted an extensive study of young men and women who spend much of their time in virtual worlds in cyberspace, says that at least some among the
first generation of the postmodern era are beginning to exhibit what psychologists call "multiple personas". In cyberspace, says Turkle,
"hundreds of thousands, perhaps already millions of users create online personae who live in a diverse group of virtual communities
where the routine formation of multiple identities undermines any notion of a real and unitary self."
Jeremy Rifkin.
The Age of Access: The new culture of hypercapitalism where all life is a paid-for experience.
NY: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, 2000:210.
And See:
Sherry Turkle
Life on the Screen: Identity in the age of the internet.
NY: Simon & Schuster, 1995:267.
- Ralph B. Allison
A New Treatment Approach for Multiple Personalities.
Am. J. Clin. Hypn. 1974:30(17):15-32.
- Haraldur Erlendsson
Multiple Personality Disorder - Demons and Angels or Archetypal aspects of the inner self.
1 June 2003.
- Rudolf Otto
The Idea of the Holy
John W. Harvey, Trans. London: Oxford University Press. 1926.
The holy: an inquiry into the non-rational factor in the idea of the divine and its relation to the rational. Original work published 1917.
Numinous Analytical Psychology, Gale Dictionary of Psychoanalysis
The term numinous, based on the Latin numen ("will, the active power of the divine") was coined by Rudolf Otto (1917/1926) to define a "category for the interpretation and evaluation" of nonrational
manifestations of the sacred. According to Otto, the numinous is characterized by a "sense of one's creature state" (p. 10), mystical awe (tremendum), a presentiment of divine power (majestas), amazement
in the face of the "completely other" (mysterium), demoniacal energy, and paradox.
Otto's phenomenological method and the importance he granted to experience are congruent with the empirical approach of Carl Gustav Jung, who as a matter of course integrated this notion into his own field of research
beginning in the 1930s (Jung, 1937-40). He had previously used the term numen to describe the autonomy of psychic energy, conceived in its most primitive sense, in relation to mana (spiritual power)
(Jung, 1928b [1948], p. 233). [...] Read More (scroll down)
- Sarah Y. Krakauer
Treating Dissociative Identity Disorder: The Power of the Collective Heart
Ann Arbour MI: Edwards Brothers, 2001.
- Hesiod
Works and Days (120-125)
Richmond Lattimore, trans.
Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1959/68:33.
- Jean Shinoda Bolen
op. cit., 1989:12
- John A. Sanford
Fate, Love, and Ecstasy: Wisdom from the lesser-known goddesses of the greeks.
Wilmette ILL: Chiron, 1995:27. |